Cardiopulmonary responses to neurophysiological facilitation of respiration in mechanically ventilated ICU patients

  • Received 13.01.2026
  • Revised 20.04.2026
  • Accepted 26.05.2026
  • Published 29.05.2026
  • 78 Views
  • Retrieved from Vol. 12, No. 1, 2026
  • Pages 14-22

Mechanical ventilation is essential in acute illness but may lead to complications such as atelectasis and monotonous breathing, which physiotherapists help counter by using neurophysiological facilitation techniques to enhance the respiratory function of unconscious and sedated patients. By exploring neurophysiological facilitation techniques, the study aimed to evaluate the immediate effects of perioral pressure and intercostal stretch on cardiopulmonary parameters in mechanically ventilated patients at the University of Benin Teaching Hospital. A randomised crossover experimental design was used, involving ten patients (5 males, 5 females; mean age 66.2 ± 8.5 years) who were haemodynamically stable but unconscious and ventilated. Cardiopulmonary variables including systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and mean arterial pressure were measured before and after each neurophysiological facilitation techniques intervention using a standardised protocol. The results showed that perioral pressure significantly improved diastolic blood pressure (77.10±9.01 to 79.30±10.34 mmHg, p=0.005), respiratory rate (26.40 ± 6.08 to 28.30 ± 6.60 breaths/min, p = 0.014), and mean arterial pressure (92.70 ± 10.70 to 94.00 ± 10.06 mmHg, p = 0.022). Intercostal stretch significantly increased respiratory rate (26.8 ± 6.07 to 28.2 ± 6.07 breaths/min, p < 0.001), while changes in systolic pressure, heart rate, and oxygen saturation were not statistically significant (p>0.05). Gender did not influence the magnitude of changes in any cardiopulmonary parameter. The study established that neurophysiological facilitation techniques elicited beneficial acute effects on respiratory rate and haemodynamic parameters in mechanically ventilated patients and highlighted neurophysiological facilitation techniques as a practical adjunct to respiratory physiotherapy for improved cardiopulmonary stability in critically ill patients

haemodynamic parameters; perioral pressure; intercostal stretch; respiratory therapy intervention; intensive care physiotherapy

https://doi.org/10.63341/ijmmr/1.2026.14
  1. Das S, Sikka G, Kumar P. Combined effect of expiratory rib cage compression technique and intercostal stretch technique on static lung compliance and hemodynamic parameters in mechanically ventilated patients. Int J Sci Healthc Res. 2025;10(4):170–80. DOI: 10.52403/ijshr.20250425
  2. Carabalí-Rivera JA, Salazar-Muñoz V, Villanueva-Londoño ED, González-Ruiz K, Arzayus-Patiño L. Respiratory muscle training in mechanically ventilated adult patients: Toward a precise prescription based on current evidence: A scoping review. J Clin Med. 2025;14(14):5058. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14145058
  3. Mankad D, Trivedi S, Bhatt JP. Role of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation techniques of respiration in mechanically ventilated patients – a systematic review of clinical evidence. Int J Health Sci Res. 2024;14(1):54–62. DOI: 10.52403/ijhsr.20240108
  4. Chowdhury KN. Effectiveness of intercostal stretch technique on pulmonary conditions: A narrative review. J Pulmonol Respir Res. 2024;8(2):48–52. DOI: 10.29328/journal.jprr.1001059
  5. Tong S, Yang Y, Li Y, Liu L, Chang W. Consequences in critically ill patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation after diaphragmatic stimulation techniques: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2025;15(9):e098814. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-098814
  6. Bassi T, Rohrs E, Parfait M, Hannigan BC, Reynolds S, Mayaux J, et al. Restoring brain connectivity by phrenic nerve stimulation in sedated and mechanically ventilated patients. Commun Med. 2024;4:235. DOI: 10.1038/s43856-024-00662-0
  7. Azimi F, Nazari AM, Yadollahi F, Etemadifar S, Kheiri S, Masoudi R. The comparison of two types of physiotherapy techniques on selected weaning indices of patients requiring mechanical ventilation: A single-blind randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2025;15:18489. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-03701-5
  8. Bickenbach J, Fritsch S, Cosler S, Simon Y, Dreher M, Theisen S, et al. Effects of structured protocolized physical therapy on the duration of mechanical ventilation in patients with prolonged weaning. J Crit Care. 2024;80:154491. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2023.154491
  9. Xingyu X, Zhang D, Cheng S. Effects of pulmonary rehabilitation on respiratory function in mechanically ventilated patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pulm Med. 2025;25(1):4. DOI: 10.1186/s12890-024-03461-4
  10. The World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects [Internet]. [cited 2024 December 13]. Available from: https://www.wma.net/what-we-do/medical-ethics/declaration-of-helsinki/
  11. European Commission. Ethics and Data Protection [Internet]. 2021 July 5 [cited 2024 December 2]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/horizon/guidance/ethics-and-data-protection_he_en.pdf
  12. Jones B, Kenward MG. Design and analysis of cross-over trials. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2014. 438 P. DOI: 10.1201/b17537
  13. Thorat KD, Tungikar S, Lofvenmark I. Effectiveness of respiratory proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation techniques on pulmonary functions in spinal cord injury patients: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Res Med Sci. 2024;12(7):2390–7. DOI: 10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20241888
  14. Salve A, Maghade S, Katke S, Prabhakar R, Lodhi MS. Effect of vertebral pressure and intercostal stretch techniques on respiratory rate, tidal volume, SpO₂ and heart rate among organophosphorus poisoning patients: An experimental study. Int J Health Sci Res. 2021;11(7):265–71. DOI: 10.52403/ijhsr.20210736
  15. Jenkins TO, MacBean V, Poulsen MK, Karbing DS, Rees SE, Patel BV, et al. The metabolic cost of inspiratory muscle training in mechanically ventilated patients in critical care. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2023;11:41. DOI: 10.1186/s40635-023-00522-6
  16. Kumar S, Pottur G, Mitra S, Kushwaha AK, Kuma P, Pal Singh S, et al. Correlation of dyspnea with age and SpO₂ levels in COVID‑19 and effectiveness of neurophysiological facilitation in the management of dyspnea – a randomized clinical trial. Egyp J Phys Ther. 2020;4:25–31.
  17. Patel S, Prajapati H. Effect of neurophysiological facilitation of respiration on respiratory rate and chest expansion in children with spastic cerebral palsy – an experimental study. Int J Sci Res. 2021;10(3):1525–8. DOI: 10.21275/sr21318132259
  18. Zhou Q, Zhang Y, Yao W, Liang S, Feng H, Pan H. Effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation combined with threshold inspiratory muscle training on respiratory function in neurocritical patients with weaning failure: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Rehabil Res. 2024;47(3):164–8. DOI: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000627
  19. Nair A, Alaparthi GK, Krishnan S, Rai S, Anand R, Acharya V, et al. Comparison of diaphragmatic stretch technique and manual diaphragm release technique on diaphragmatic excursion in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A randomized crossover trial. Pulm Med. 2019;2019:6364376. DOI: 10.1155/2019/6364376
  20. Réginault T, Alejos RM, Coueron R, Burle JF, Boyer A, Frison E, et al. Impacts of three inspiratory muscle training programs on inspiratory muscles strength and endurance among intubated and mechanically ventilated patients with difficult weaning: A multicentre randomised controlled trial. J Intensive Care. 2024;12:28. DOI: 10.1186/s40560-024-00741-3
  21. de Medeiros AIC, Fuzari HKB, Rattesa C, Brandão DC, de Melo Marinho PÉ. Inspiratory muscle training improves respiratory muscle strength, functional capacity and quality of life in patients with chronic kidney disease: A systematic review. J Physiother. 2017;63(2):76–83. DOI: 10.1016/j.jphys.2017.02.016
  22. Etikan I, Musa SA, Alkassim RS. Comparison of convenience sampling andpurposive sampling. Am J Theor Appl Stat. 2016;5(1):1–4. DOI: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11