Internal fixation of humeral shaft fractures using a dynamic compression plate: A prospective study

Fractures of the humeral shaft present a challenge due to their unique anatomical and biomechanical characteristics. Fixation with a dynamic compression plate is a widely adopted technique for the surgical management of these fractures, aiming to achieve stable fixation and promote early mobilisation. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of dynamic compression plate fixation in humeral shaft fractures. This prospective study included 40 patients with displaced humeral shaft fractures, including Grade I and II open fractures. Preoperative assessments comprised clinical examinations and radiographic evaluations. Surgical fixation was performed using a dynamic compression plate, and postoperative follow-up was conducted at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Modified Stewart & Hundley classification, and statistical analysis was carried out. The study cohort had a mean age of 32.64 years (±4.77) and was predominantly male (65%). The most common cause of injury was road traffic accidents (55%). Type A fractures were the most frequent (42.5%), with 70% involving the right upper limb. The mean time to union was 4.58 ± 1.06 months. At 6 months, 10 patients had excellent outcomes, 21 had good, 8 had fair, and 1 had a poor outcome (p < 0.0001). Preoperative complications included multiple injuries. Postoperative complications were minimal, with only one case of malunion reported. The findings suggest that dynamic compression plate fixation is an effective method for the management of humeral shaft fractures, demonstrating significant improvements in alignment and functional outcomes, with low complication rates and favourable union times. These results support the reliability of dynamic compression plating in optimising treatment approaches and improving patient outcomes

surgical fixation; fracture healing; orthopaedic surgery; clinical outcomes; range of motion

https://doi.org/10.63341/ijmmr/1.2025.33
  1. Olson JJ, Entezari V, Vallier HA. Risk factors for nonunion after traumatic humeral shaft fractures in adults. JSES Int. 2020;4(4):734–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.06.009
  2. Goyal S, Ambade R, Singh R, Lohiya A, Patel H, Patel SK, et al. A comprehensive review of proximal humerus fractures: From epidemiology to treatment strategies. Cureus. 2024;16(4):e57691. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.57691
  3. Hardy M, Feehan LM. Fracture healing: An evolving perspective. In: Rehabilitation of the hand and upper extremity. 7th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2021. P. 264–75.
  4. Burki AU, Bajwa MA, Bajwa SM, Bajwa MA, Hussain HA, Bukhari SAH. Treatment of closed humerus diaphyseal fractures using a functional brace. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2020;70(1):136–40.
  5. Kandemir U, Naclerio EH, McKee MD, Weatherby DJ, Cole PA, Tetsworth K. Humerus fractures: Selecting fixation for a successful outcome. OTA Int. 2023;6(3S):e259. DOI: 10.1097/oi9.0000000000000259
  6. Bhartiya RK, Singh SK, Singh P, Gill SPS, Mishra L, Arora J. Evaluation of outcomes of distal femoral fractures treated by retrograde nailing technique. J Bone Joint Dis. 2021;36(2):8–13. DOI: 10.4103/jbjd.jbjd_8_21
  7. Angachekar D, Patel S, Shetty S, Atal S, Dhond A, Sharma R, et al. A retrospective analysis of dynamic compression plating versus intramedullary nailing for the management of shaft of humerus fractures in an urban trauma care center. Cureus. 2024;16(1):e52883. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.52883
  8. Chandan RK, Sinha V, Bhushan DP. Comparison of results between dynamic compression plate and interlocking nail for the management of fracture shaft of humerus. Int J Orthop Sci. 2020;6(1):249–52. DOI: 10.22271/ortho.2020.v6.i1e.1867
  9. Hussain B, Ullah Z, Hussain G, Napar AR, Latif M, Arif M. Compare the functional outcome of dynamic compression plating versus interlocking nail procedure for fracture shaft of humerus. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2020;14(4):1314–6.
  10. The World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects [Internet]. [cited 2024 December 25]. Available from: https://www.wma.net/what-we-do/medical-ethics/declaration-of-helsinki/
  11. Deepak CD, Mahesh DV, Ravoof A, Sai SK. Comparative study of surgical management of humeral shaft fractures with dynamic compression plate in Henry’s and Thompson’s approach in adults. Int J Res Orthop. 2017;3(2):231–4. DOI: 10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20170779
  12. Griend RV, Tomasin J, Ward EF. Open reduction and internal fixation of humeral shaft fractures. Results using AO plating techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68(3):430–3.
  13. Hee HT, Low BY, See HF. Surgical results of open reduction and plating of humeral shaft fractures. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1998;27(6):772–5.
  14. Sharma GM, Bhardwaj AR, Shah S. Antegrade versus retrograde nailing in humeral shaft fractures: A prospective study. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020;11(1S):37–41. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.04.020
  15. Yiğit Ş. What should be the timing of surgical treatment of humeral shaft fractures? Medicine. 2020;99(17):e19858. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019858
  16. Meekers FSL, Broos PLO. Operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures. The Leuven experience. Acta Orthop Belg. 2002;68(5):462–70.
  17. Ghrairi M, Hammouda O, Malliaropoulos N. Muscular strength profile in Tunisian male national judo team. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2014;4(2):149–53.
  18. Marcondes FB, Castropil W, Schor B, Miana A, Vasconcelos R, Etchebehere M. Shoulder isokinetic performance in healthy professional judo athletes: Normative data. Acta Ortop Bras. 2019;27(6):308–12. DOI: 10.1590/1413-785220192706223708
  19. Drid P, Casals C, Mekic A, Radjo I, Stojanovic M, Ostojic SM. Fitness and anthropometric profiles of international vs. national judo medalists in half-heavyweight category. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29(8):2115–21. DOI: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000000861
  20. McKee MD, Wilson TL, Winston L, Schemitsch EH, Richards RR. Functional outcome following surgical treatment of intra-articular distal humeral fractures through a posterior approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82(12):1701–7. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200012000-00003
  21. Mast JW, Spiegel PG, Harvey Jr JP, Harrison C. Fractures of the humeral shaft: A retrospective study of 240 adult fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1975;112:254–62.
  22. Klenerman L. The treatment of fractures of the humerus by plating. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1966;48(1):105–11.
  23. Raghavendra S, Bhalodiya HP. Internal fixation of fractures of the shaft of the humerus by dynamic compression plate or intramedullary nail: A prospective study. Indian J Orthop. 2007;41(3):214–8. DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.33685