Synergistic potential of aqueous ozone: Sublethal bacterial damage and enhanced antibiotic susceptibility

  • Received 22.12.2024
  • Revised 19.03.2025
  • Accepted 27.05.2025
  • 995 Views
  • Retrieved from Vol. 11, No. 1, 2025
  • Pages 6-13

Combat-related injuries are frequently complicated by infections caused by multidrug‑resistant microorganisms, posing significant challenges to treatment. To improve clinical outcomes in such cases, alternative adjunctive therapeutic strategies are required. This study aimed to assess the antimicrobial potential of electrolytically generated aqueous ozone, focusing on its ability to induce sublethal damage in bacteria and enhance their susceptibility to antibiotics. A total of 357 multidrug-resistant clinical isolates were obtained from wound exudates and blood samples of 284 wounded soldiers. The most frequently isolated pathogens included Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus, and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp. Ozonated water was generated at concentrations ranging from 3.6 to 11.2 mg/L and subsequently standardised to approximately 4 mg/L for bacterial treatment. Selected isolates of S. aureus and Escherichia coli were exposed to aqueous ozone for 10 and 15 minutes. Sublethal damage was assessed by comparing bacterial growth on selective and non‑selective media, revealing up to 89.2% sublethally injured S. aureus cells and up to 98.6% injured E. coli cells after 15 minutes of exposure. Initial estimations of the minimum inhibitory concentration using the Vitek-2 system were distorted by the combined effect of ozone and free chlorine, which forms during the electrolysis of saline solution. This prompted a shift to the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. The results consistently demonstrated increased antibiotic susceptibility in treated isolates, as evidenced by larger inhibition zone diameters and a reduced number of antibiotics to which the isolates remained resistant. Electrolytically generated aqueous ozone effectively compromises bacterial integrity, enhancing their susceptibility to antibiotics. It represents a promising adjunctive strategy for managing multidrug-resistant infections, particularly in resource-limited settings or during wartime

antibacterial activity; antibiotic resistance; ozonated water; pathogenic bacteria; sublethal damage

https://doi.org/10.63341/ijmmr/1.2025.06
  1. Khanashyam AC, Shanker MA, Kothakota A, Mahanti NK, Pandiselvam R. Ozone applications in milk and meat industry. Ozone Sci Eng. 2022;44(1):50–65. DOI: 10.1080/01919512.2021.1947776
  2. Ren X, Wu Q, Shu J, Chen C, Tiraferri A, Liu B. Efficient removal of organic matters and typical odor substances in rural drinking water using Ozone-BAC-UF combined system to meet new water quality standards in China. Sep Purif Technol. 2023;327:124899. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.124899
  3. Nagy A. Beauty and physics – physics projects based on modern aesthetic and medical treatments. J Phys Conf Ser. 2021;1929(1):012027. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1929/1/012027
  4. Lemmen SW, Lewalter K. Antibiotic stewardship and horizontal infection control are more effective than screening, isolation and eradication. Infection. 2018;46(5):581–90. DOI: 10.1007/s15010-018-1137-1
  5. Roth A, Krishnakumar A, Rahimi R. Ozone as a topical treatment for infected dermal wounds. Front Biosci (Elite Ed). 2023;15(2):9. DOI: 10.31083/j.fbe1502009
  6. Roy J, Pandey V, Gupta I, Shekhar H. Antibacterial sonodynamic therapy: Current status and future perspectives. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2021;7(12):5326–38. DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c00587
  7. Pérez-Santonja JJ, Güell JL, Gris O, Vázquez Dorrego XM, Pellicer E, Benítez-Del-Castillo JM. Liposomal ozonated oil in ocular infections: A review of preclinical and clinical studies, focusing on its antiseptic and regenerative properties. Clin Ophthalmol. 2022;16:1953–62. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S360929
  8. Li HY, Deng C, Zhao L, Gong CH, Zhu MF, Chen JW. Ozone water production using a SPE electrolyzer equipped with boron doped diamond electrodes. Water Supply. 2022;22(4):3993–4005. DOI: 10.2166/ws.2022.029
  9. Grignani E, Mansi A, Cabella R, Castellano P, Tirabasso A, Sisto R, et al. Safe and effective use of ozone as air and surface disinfectant in the conjuncture of Covid-19. Gases. 2020;1(1):19–32. DOI: 10.3390/gases1010002
  10. Shynkaryk M, Pyatkovskyy T, Yousef AE, Sastry SK. In-situ monitoring of inactivation of Listeria innocua under high hydrostatic pressure using electrical conductivity measurement. J Food Eng. 2020;285:110087. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2020.110087
  11. The World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects [Internet]. [cited 2024 December 13]. Available from: https://www.wma.net/what-we-do/medical-ethics/declaration-of-helsinki/
  12. Trutyak I, Los D, Medzyn V, Trunkvalter V, Zukovsky V. Treatment of combat surgical trauma of the limbs in the conditions of modern war. Proc Shevchenko Sci Soc Med Sci. 2022;69(2). DOI: 10.25040/ntsh2022.02.16
  13. Loban’ G, Faustova M, Dobrovolska O, Tkachenko P. War in Ukraine: Incursion of antimicrobial resistance. Irish J Med Sci (1971 -). 2023;192(6):2905–7. DOI: 10.1007/s11845-023-03401-x
  14. Moussally K, Abu-Sittah G, Gomez FG, Fayad AA, Farra A. Antimicrobial resistance in the ongoing Gaza war: A silent threat. Lancet. 2023;402(10416):1972–3. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02508-4
  15. Epelle EI, Macfarlane A, Cusack M, Burns A, Amaeze N, Richardson K, et al. Stabilisation of ozone in water for microbial disinfection. Environments. 2022;9(4):45. DOI: 10.3390/environments9040045
  16. Okada F, Nay K. Electrolysis for ozone water production. In: Kleperis J, Linkov V, editors. Electrolysis. London: InTech; 2012. P. 243–72. DOI: 10.5772/51945
  17. Pyatkovskyy T, Pokryshko O, Danylkov S. Exploring water disinfection through electrolytic ozonation for application in wartime conditions. Bull Med Biol Res. 2024;6(1):43–51. DOI: 10.61751/bmbr/1.2024.43
  18. Khadre MA, Yousef AE, Kim JG. Microbiological aspects of ozone applications in food: A review. J Food Sci. 2001;66:1242–52. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2001.tb15196.x
  19. Kim S, Kim MH, Lee WI, Kang SY, Jeon YL. Misidentification of Acinetobacter baumannii as Alcaligenes faecalis by VITEK 2 system; case report. Lab Med. 2018;49(1):e14–7. DOI: 10.1093/labmed/lmx062
  20. De Lappe N, Lee C, O’Connor J, Cormican M. Misidentification of Listeria monocytogenes by the Vitek 2 system. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52(9):3494–5. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01725-14
  21. Zong Z, Wang X, Deng Y, Zhou T. Misidentification of Burkholderia pseudomallei as Burkholderia cepacia by the VITEK 2 system. J Med Microbiol. 2012;61(10):1483–4. DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.041525-0
  22. Park TS, Oh SH, Lee EY, Lee TK, Park KH, Figueras MJ, et al. Misidentification of Aeromonas veronii biovar sobria as Vibrio alginolyticus by the Vitek system. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2003;37(4):349–53. DOI: 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2003.01410.x
  23. Wang TKF, Yam WC, Yuen KY, Wong SSY. Misidentification of a mucoid strain of Salmonella enterica serotype choleraesuis as Hafnia alvei by the Vitek GNI+ card system. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(12):4605–8. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01488-06
  24. Wesche AM, Gurtler JB, Marks BP, Ryser ET. Stress, sublethal injury, resuscitation, and virulence of bacterial foodborne pathogens. J Food Prot. 2009;72(5):1121–38. DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X-72.5.1121
  25. Bai C, Cai Y, Sun T, Li G, Wang W, Wong PK, et al. Mechanism of antibiotic resistance spread during sub-lethal ozonation of antibiotic-resistant bacteria with different resistance targets. Water Res. 2024;259:121837. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2024.121837